ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA by ERNEST HILLEMACHER 9 Completed

Conclusion

There was really only a single satisfactory viewpoint for this piece, with the monument walls blocking off any other viewpoints. Hence the shadowbox approach was selected as it confines the viewer to this singular vision. 

Bringing the scene to the front minimizes the depth and size of the shadow box and keeps the scene compact and visually tight (Fig 25, 26, 27 and 28). 

The shadow box genre remains a daunting and challenging modelling prospect but was an ultimately and satisfying project following completion. The shadow box can be displayed tilted up to rest on the display stand (Fig 29).

References
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eug%C3%A8ne_Ernest_Hillemacher
http://shakespeare.mit.edu/cleopatra/index.html
http://www.bluffton.edu/homepages/facstaff/sullivanm/egypt/thebes/medhabu/medhabu.html

Fig 25. The completed scene fully fitted out. 

Fig 26. The frame was added. A brass name plate was added to the frame. 

Fig 27. A close-up of the framed scene. 

Fig 28. The framed scene fully lit up. 

Fig 29. The completed shadow box diorama.

ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA by ERNEST HILLEMACHER 8

Final Assembly

The settee, statue and figures were pinned and attached to the stage. Some minor accessories were also added to the stage (Fig 21). The ropes were then added to the scene, linking the Anthony Group to the Cleopatra Group figures. This was very fiddly work, and was carried out using tweezers. An LED light strip with a driver and wall plug was used to provide an internal light source (Fig 22). The LED light strip was installed on top and the driver was tucked underneath the stage (Fig 23). The frame including the glass panel and cutout frame was now fitted to the front and secured with magnetic latches on both sides (Fig 24).

Fig 21. Further test-fitting of components. 

Fig 22. LED light strip with driver and 240 Amp plug. 

Fig 23. The LED light strip and driver installed inside the shadow box. A hole was drilled at the back of the box to pass through the wall plug wire. 

Fig 24. Magnetic latches were installed to secure the frame.

ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA by ERNEST HILLEMACHER 7

The parapet walls were made from wood and plastic tubing (Fig 17).

When I was satisfied with the initial trial fitting of the scene (Fig 18), I proceeded on with the final adjustments and painting. As I was dealing with an internal light source, I took every precaution to mask off any gaps to prevent any light filtering through to spoil the final scene. Cutouts were made for a backdrop side monument wall and obelisk which were painted (Fig 19). These will be fitted to the left side of the scene.



Painting

Oil paints were used because I like to mix my colours. I notice that homogenous colours give off a very dull effect when compared to heterogenous colours. Simply put, this is the “pointillism” approach where the individual colours are constantly mixed and processed in the viewer’s eyes and always appear refreshing. Oil paints are never mixed perfectly and the various colour flecks create this interesting effect.

I approached this piece as if I was doing a painting. As stated earlier, all the component parts were painted at various stages during the construction to facilitate access to awkward areas. I matched all tonal colours as close to the original painting as possible. The backdrop and stage were painted. The figures were given basic undercoats with enamel paints and finished off with artist oils. Where appropriate, I applied matt varnish or semi-gloss to the figures after the oils had dried out.

The walls were sprayed with matt white and painted. An old toothbrush was used to flick small drops of paint onto the painted walls. This creates a nice “granite look” to the walls. A fine-tipped brown-coloured pen was used to draw in the granite slabs and Egyptian hieroglyphs. Cuts and nicks were made to the walls along the granite slabs to further create a 3-dimensional look (Fig 20).

Fig 17. The parapet walls being constructed. 

Fig 18. The first framed trial fitting of the scene. 

Fig 19. The side monument wall and obelisk cutouts for the backdrop. 

Fig 20. Detailing the monument walls. a - spray painted; b - hieroglyphics and shadows added. 

ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA by ERNEST HILLEMACHER 6

The Shadow Box Frame and Shell – A commercial IKEA Ribba frame was adapted for the shadow box. The frame has side depth which creates an overlap for strengthening the shell for this diorama. The shell was constructed from light basswood cut to fit neatly inside the IKEA frame (Fig 13). The back of the frame was attached to the sides to complete the shell. The shell was carefully sanded smooth, stained in dark red brown and varnished in gloss.

Backdrop, Stage and Walls - The backdrop was formed from thin cardboard and then covered with gesso and lightly sanded. The backdrop was glued to the inside of the shadow box shell before it was painted (Fig 14).

The elevated stage was made to slant slightly downwards towards the foreground and the front edge was hidden beneath the lip of the cutout frame. Some minor ground work with small stones and details were added to the elevated stage and it was painted (Fig 15).

Using the cutouts as templates, the monument walls were made from thick cardboard and a cardboard carton tube. The tube was trimmed to size and diameter to fit into the scene. The monument walls were glued at obtuse angles, visually adjusted for slight perspectives. The left edge of the monument was made with plastic tubing. Cardboard pieces were glued to the back of the monument wall structures to provide structural strength which were adjusted to fit snugly against the backdrop. 

A basic test-fitting of the scene was carried out. The elevated stage was placed in the shadow box and held in place by wooden strip runners. The monument walls were glued onto the elevated stage (Fig 16).

Fig 13. Shadowbox shell constructed to fit within the IKEA frame. The backdrop and elevated stage have been constructed. 

Fig 14. The backdrop has been glued to inside the shadow box. The elevated stage and the monument wall structures being test-fitted within the shadow box. The position of the stage is finalized by wooden strip runners. 
 

Fig 15. The stage scattered with small stones and painted with artist oils. 

Fig 16. Construction of the scene within the diorama box. a - basic test-fitting; b - monument walls being constructed to fit into the scene.

ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA by ERNEST HILLEMACHER 5

Then the fully painted figures were assembled. The assembly sequence was important as all the figures were interlocked. First, the two Egyptian servants were epoxied into their positions. Then the Antony-soldier pair was epoxied. The Nubian slave was now added and epoxied. Some minor details were re-worked to ensure that the figures integrated well within this group on the settee.

The statue of Sekhmet was sculpted from epoxy putty over the wooden armature (Fig 9). When most of the statue was sculpted, the helmeted soldier standing on it was pinned and epoxied to the statue to fix his position (Fig 10). The wire insert from the hoist was attached to the helmeted soldier. Putty was then used to create basic shapes for the hoists and the details were then sculpted later.

The Roman Group – This comprised a Roman senator (fully visible) and behind him, a Roman standard-bearer. A piece of brass wire was cut to serve as the Roman standard handle (Fig 11).

The Cleopatra Group - The women figures were easier to sculpt as their lower bodies were not visible below the parapet (Fig 12).
 

Fig 9. Construction of the Sekhmet statue. a –armature and head; b – finished sculpture; c – undercoated with enamels. 

Fig 10. The Sekhmet statue with attached helmeted soldier, fully painted. 

Fig 11. Construction of the Roman Group. a – figures being sculpted; b – the Roman standard was made from a Historex eagle, cardboard and some brass trinkets; c - figures fully painted. 

Fig 12. Construction of the Cleopatra Group. a – figures being sculpted; b – fully painted.\